I'm taking the aggregate response to dyams, rcade. Two of those are mine, and using them to back up your statement that we're calling anyone an idiot is comical. But I have trouble understanding anyone who claims he actually didn't do the crime. And I do. How much more sweeter could I have put that. I did watch the trial, and every detail has come out over the years. There is no "nuance" left unturned. There's nothing the jury saw that I haven't. What part of that is wrong? Trial of the century, right? That was in response to the claim that "we" weren't on the jury, so we didn't hear the whole case. I introduce it just to show that there are other possibilities out there, and to show that one possibility was completely shut out of the civil trial. Draw your own conclusions. So nicole brown was sexually adventurous? Am I missing something? Finally someone with the ability to think beyond the media circus this event was. posted by dyams Well that came out of no where. This has nothing to do with a media circus. It has to do with logic. Looking at the evidence and deciding for myself that the chances of O.J. not committing the crimes are extremely unlikely. But you're both right. Because I wasn't standing at the gate watching O.J. slash their throats, I could be wrong. Of course, people saw us land on the moon and many don't believe that either. So maybe O.J. was framed with a huge police conspiracy, by cops who barely knew each other. And the DNA guys were in on it too. And O.J. just happened to be late coming to the door. And the limo driver just happened to see someone run across the yard. And kato just happened to hear a bump at the back fence at the same time. And the glove was planted. And O.J. just happened to cut his hand on a glass the same night of the murders, and maybe domestic violence and jealousy isn't enough to push someone over the edge. Poor guy. I almost feels sorry for him.
Again, maybe take a second to think beyond what seems to be so plainly obvious. The police wouldn't necessarily have wanted to frame O.J. for any particular reason. What they had to do was find SOMEONE guilty, whatever it took. Can you imagine how much worse this case would have made the LA Police look, with a world-wide audience watching, if they couldn't seem to pin the crime on someone? They needed a conviction, and OJ, whether he did it (which is extemely possible) or didn't do it, wasn't the point for them. One of the things that always bothered me most about the case was how utterly bloody and messy the crime scene was, but how all they could find in the vehicle, etc., was a few dots of blood. You'd think after he killed a fairly good-sized guy (in what was described as a serious struggle), then nearly chopped a woman's head off, he would have had blood all over himself from head to toe, getting all over everything. There were reasons he wasn't convicted in the initial trial, based on evidence gathered (or not gathered). Getting back to the original point of the story, though, I'm sure many individuals would want OJ's autograph, be it for his athletic accomplishments, or because he was involved in one of the most famous trials of the century.
Yada Yada come on folks, when will this debate end. Did he or didn't he? Who cares. The question and debate that everyone should be talking about is, " Who will win the MLB World Series?
Two words - "NOT GUILTY" That is all that truly matters. Do I think he did it? no, but I think he was involved in some form - hired the guy to kill them, or knows who really did it. Regardless, he was one of the best RBs to ever play the game. This OJ guilty or not guilty is right up there with the Jon Benet crap -- anyone care to chime in about that one now? lol So for the record, these are the top 10 questions we need answered and apparently, this is the site to get them answered: 1. Who killed Nicole? 2. Who killed Jon Benet? 3. Who killed Kennedy? 4. Who killed MLK Jr? 5. Where is Osama? 6. Is Elvis really dead, or is he delivering pizza in Georgia? 7. What happened in Roswell? 8. Are we really being affected by the "greenhouse effect"? 9. How did life begin on Earth? 10. What is the meaning of life? /sarcasm off
The Guardian notes the 10th anniversary of the verdict. From the article: "Last year, on the 10th anniversary of the murders, he told Fox News that he was about to re-enter public life with a TV show in which he would pull practical jokes on unsuspecting victims. On a scale of one to 10, 'it's 7 or 8 that it's gonna happen," he said. It never happened.'" Who wouldn't want to be put into an unstable, uncomfortable situation and have O.J. Simpson spring out and surprise them? I'd watch that show.
Yada Yada come on folks, when will this debate end. Did he or didn't he? Who cares. The question and debate that everyone should be talking about is, " Who will win the MLB World Series? Some individuals need to read the topics a bit better prior to clicking on one. If you don't like the topic, don't read it, and definitely, don't respond to it. It's a fairly simple concept if you think about it. Provided you have a fourth-grade reading comprehension level.
Hey, no witness, no murder weapon and convictions get a little difficult. Especially with the combined GNP of Burma in defense council superstars. And that is all I will ever say on this totally retarded matter. A blight on society and our seemingless insatiable appeptite for celebrity. Seriously, it makes me do that wet burp thing in my mouth.
...using them to back up your statement that we're calling anyone an idiot is comical. The statement used to say dyams is being called an idiot was not yours. It was willthrill's. Here it is: ...most everyone in their right mind knows he was guilty ...and here's the definition of "idiot." idiot ( P ) Pronunciation Key (d-t) n. A foolish or stupid person. A person of profound mental retardation having a mental age below three years and generally being unable to learn connected speech or guard against common dangers. We're not in our right minds, apparently ... hence, idiots. There's nothing the jury saw that I haven't. Wow. So you sat and watched every single moment of the trial, could send questions to the judge and the attorneys for clarification and had access to examine the evidence close-up and at your own pace? Nevermind then -- I wasn't aware you were one of the 12 jurors on the case. So Nicole Brown was sexually adventurous? Am I missing something? I'd say you are, or you're just deliberately leaving out the main thrust of that coverage. Nicole Brown-Simpson at the very least was very close friends with people who had serious drug problems, and quite possibly had begun using herself. The fact she was sleeping with Faye Resnick and supposedly going for a threesome with her and Ron Goldman is irrelevant. Associating with people who might be in bad sorts with drug dealers isn't. Look, again, for the umpteenth time, I agree with you -- Simpson most likely did it. I'm just not 100% sure, and I think many people (perhaps not you, I don't know) just immediately accepted that Simpson did it, and that no other possible explanation even merited attention. I disagree with that.
Wow. So you sat and watched every single moment of the trial, could send questions to the judge and the attorneys for clarification and had access to examine the evidence close-up and at your own pace? Nevermind then -- I wasn't aware you were one of the 12 jurors on the case. Come on now. All I'm saying is I paid enough attention, and read enough, that I'm not missing some piece of evidence that would make me question my opinion. Look, again, for the umpteenth time, I agree with you -- Simpson most likely did it. I'm just not 100% sure, and I think many people (perhaps not you, I don't know) just immediately accepted that Simpson did it, and that no other possible explanation even merited attention. I disagree with that. Well, then let's agree to agree. I have no problem with the not guilty verdict. i don't agree, but I understand. And I don't think someone who thinks O.J. didn't do it is an idiot. It just amazes me. But I'm amazed all the time.
IN FAIRNESS TO O.J. (and getting back to the topic at hand...) he did ahem, star in a lot of movies such as "The Towering Inferno" (disaster flick) and "Capricorn One" (conspiracy suspense) that might marginally fall under the "horror" umbrella and his appearance signing autographs there might be tangetially appropriate, if somewhat in poor taste. He does, after all, have to make a living, and bankrolling his ongoing search for the REAL killer doesn't come cheap, especially when you can't find any PI's convinced of your innocence to do it pro bono. I almost forgot O.J. appeared in "Roots."
Rcade, willthrill72....get a clue.....As dyrams clearly pointed out..Nicole Simpson was not a Saint..She was known as a Cocaine User & Buyer.. It's interesting that your so angry at OJ,,, get angry at the LA Police for not calling out the Coroner to determine the time of death (Which is procedure in any state), instead assuming it was OJ...and relying on a Barking dog, along with A glove conveniently found below untouched cobwebs covering the scene.....And relying on a Loser like Kato... Why is it that everyone knew that OJ Simpson had issues in his first marriage, divorced after the death of a 3rd child, and married a 18 year old white woman. And at the end of the day, who has gain the most profit from this tragedy? Former Crack head & friend of Nicole - Faye who was paid big bucks for her "tell-All book, Denise Simpson... who as well is a former Cocaine abuser, and records show OJ helped her financially multiple times as well as her family business...Goldman father, who was not active in his son's life for quite some time...now playing sad father...where was he at when his son needed him growing up? And I certainly dont buy the Hero act, of Goldman traveling to Nicole house to return some Sun-Glasses...Please....Ice Cream & Bathwater...with candles lit...sends another message....more importantly the kids were at home...and did hear there mother's voice & a male voice that was not familiar.... What about the little amount of Blood found on a pair of socks, and drops of blood on the seats & steering wheel ...Please...you dont have to be a rocket scientist to know,that Golman & Nicole were stabbed multiple times & there should have been blood everywhere...Goldman was no Punk...he was in good shape & held several Karate Belts ....even the Foresnic Experts agree on this... We have so much negative crap going on ...we have young men & women dying in Iraq, children hungry & homeless due to the recent Hurricanes... And yes, I am in my right mind....I'm not a follower..I lead... I made my decision after reviewing the lack of evidence, and the way the witnesses who saw strange group of men in front of nicole's house....where treated like crap...they had nothing to gain ...only to tell what they saw & heard...Get over it.....
The mind reels at what exists between the ellipses.
O.K. So I do think some people are nuts.
It says right on the package not to take the whole box of Sudfed at once. Its bad for you, man.
oj killed nicole jon benet's parents killed her CIA killed kennedy and MLK osama is at your local 7 eleven elvis is dead there were aliens at roswell the greenhouse effect does exsist god created life and the reason we are here is to PARTY
here's the complete guest list.
Forensic experts could tell Ron Goldman knew karate? Damn, that kind of puts those punks on CSI in their place, doesn't it?
That guest list also has another Bills player on it.
And did you see who it is?
the chick from cabin fever is way hot didn't she play on that saturday morning tv show hang time where the girl plays on the boys basketball team. seeing her in a topless shot, pre teen dream come true.
Kari from the old MTV show Remote Control was there, damn.
That guest list also has another Bills player on it. Do you think he drove O.J. to the con?
Holy crap, the con really does feature one A. J. Cowlings. That guy is the most loyal servant, like, ever. Remains of the Day, dude.
