I don't know who's going to win the Rose Bowl, but whoever wins, I'm pretty sure it isn't going to be close.
After watching Texas the day after Thanksgiving against Tech (I think they were the roadkill), I have plenty of repsect for Vince Young, the Longhorn D and even some pretty good special teams but I don't think the strength of schedules compare very well. USC beat UCLA (romp) and Notre Dame (last minute, with a bit of luck) when they were top 10 teams, plus Oregon, Fresno State, Cal and whichever of the Arizona teams (State or U, don't recall) when they were ranked in the top 25. Plus the pressure of the longest Div 1 winning streak in a long time. Texas beat Ohio State early by a couple of points, a fading Oklahoma and a decent Tech. No doubt Texas want to win and can see the school's first ever BCS title (and first consensus in many years) but that doesn't seem to be the same motivation as winning three in a row plus a fourth if you think back to the AP when Oklahoma beat LSU the year before for the BCS/Coaches title. Leinart and Bush want to be in the legend books and go out on top. This will be a game, not like last year's blowout. My money's on the Trojans to raise the crystal.
"Gale Sayers" not Billy Simms. USC=42 Texas=21
Texas also beat two teams while they were in the top ten.
Did they also beat four teams between 11 & 25, with their last three wins over ranked teams Don? I don't think so. Anyway, it should be closer than last year's 36 point MOV, probably less than 10 points.
What was their average margin of victory though? Also, they cant be blamed for the conference having an off year can they?
USC has played 6 bowl eligible teams, and Texas has played 6 with (7 if u count Colorado twice). So lets not look at rankings either
This thread has turned into a pissing contest...
Go U Northwestern...
Um, Go Dawgs!??
My Ryerson Rams suffer from a weak schedule, otherwise they'd be in the ... I got nothing.