Nature's editorial (from the same issues) uses this damning language, "Nature believes that accepting 'legal limits' of specific metabolites without such rigorous verification goes against the foundational standards of modern science, and results in an arbitrary test for which the rate of false positives and false negatives can never be known. By leaving these rates unknown, and by not publishing and opening to broader scientific scrutiny the methods by which testing labs engage in study, it is Nature's view that the anti-doping authorities have fostered a sporting culture of suspicion, secrecy and fear."

posted by apoch at 06:49 AM - reply - flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive