November 01, 2007

How the Colts Fund Their Defense:

posted by yerfatma to football at 04:21 PM - 4 comments

Love the Football Outsiders stuff. It's nice to see Polian's drafting get a bit of recognition. Noone ever talks about anything other than their #1 picks during and after the draft, and then 2-3 years later a bunch of 2nd day picks or UFAs are starting and doing a better job than the big names they replaced. They did draft a safety this year, though. Brannon Condren. While he looks like a bit of a punk, he's a big, strong ballhawking hitter like the others, though I don't think he's expected to be a replacement for Sanders. I think that he's enough of a difference maker that they're going to have to break tradition and open up the wallet for him. Unlike last year, which was plagued by injuries, they have excellent depth in the defensive backfield. I do wonder if they've got guys that can make the same impact (double entendre fully intended) as Hayden and Jackson after their contracts expire. It sucks that they had to sit around for two years instead of one before getting their starting nods. If they stay true to form they won't get as many years of use out of them now.

posted by Bernreuther at 05:29 PM on November 01, 2007

The coaches of the team should also get their due, seldom have I seen a more under-rated bunch. A GM can draft diamonds in the rough, but someone has to turn them into quality players.

posted by Cave_Man at 06:50 PM on November 01, 2007

Bernreuther, do you think they will re-sign Sanders? If they do, would you be concerned they're breaking with the philosophy that made them successful?

posted by yerfatma at 08:13 PM on November 01, 2007

I think they'll have to try to sign him because it's so obvious what a difference he makes. I should've been clearer above and said that they'll have to open the wallet for Sanders. The tough one to swallow this year is going to be Clark, because he's making himself a lot of money and they probably won't be able to afford both. I don't really care if it is or isn't a departure from the philosophy... if they can fit it under the cap it really just means they'll have to stick to that philosophy even more for the rest of the positions. The decisions they've made and the kids they've taken in the past 5 drafts tells me that they are planning many years in advance and have a plan in place. Their track record makes me trust that it's the right plan. (The past several drafts does make me more optimistic about keeping Clark though, now that I mention it.) They seem to know what they're doing and their knowledge of the payroll expenses for the next several years is far greater than ours so only they know what is and isn't possible under the cap.

posted by Bernreuther at 10:38 PM on November 02, 2007

You're not logged in. Please log in or register.