- 09:06 PM
- 01/08/09
| Member since: | July 30, 2005 |
|---|---|
| Last visit: | February 19, 2006 |
cheebus has posted no links and 2 comments to SportsFilter and hasn’t posted any threads or comments
Seattle Seahawks...Oh what a difference a year makes. Just last year it seemed as if the walls were crumbling in on Mike Holmgren and the Seattle Seahawks. Will this be they year they finally get over the hump and make it to the Big Show?
posted by stockman at 07:25 AM on January 07
How about those not quite as lovable, not quite as legendary, longtime losers - the White Sox? "The team's futility has no romance, glamour, or meaning. And when they lose, they still can't win—the White Sox aren't even the losingest losers in the Second City."
posted by gspm at 07:43 PM on August 18
websters dictionary reads "wrigley field - noun - park full of lovable losers. antonyms: comisky - noun - full of white trash inbreds who beat up 1st base coaches of opposing teams"
posted at 12:34 PM on August 18
last lear there were grumblings because they had a lot togher schedule! not that they are a bad team, but when you play AZ (twice), SF(twice), STL (twice),TX, and TN you are going to look like a great team. even when they played philly and indy they were without their best guys (thats 10 wins right there) which leaves dallas and new york, which could have gone either way. washington and jacksonville, playoff contenders? - losses! i dont mean to rag on them, but i am anxious to see what they do in the playoffs against a tough team when it matters.