hey cjets, what would youd do if you were an NFL owner? Wouldn't you move to another city if you had a chance to make more money? Exactly. And while we're talking about football, even though the USC Trojans are my favourite college team, they are still just a college team. Although right now, the Rams are in the same position right now that they were in 1995 in need of a move. If the Rams fans in Saint Louis don't want to pay tickets to home games, I'm pretty sure people in LA gladly would.
The movie was released in 1989. The Rams move was in 1995. Yes, but by that time, her husband had already died under suspicious circumstances, she had fired her husband's son and she moved the team to Anaheim. I'm sure David S. Ward wrote about the Indians because he was from Cleveland. But if you reread my post, you'll see that I was only talking about the greedy female owner (remember her? The one that wanted the team to tank so she could move them from Cleveland) not the entire team. All that being said, the info I have is anecdotal so it may not be true. hey cjets, what would youd do if you were an NFL owner? Wouldn't you move to another city if you had a chance to make more money? No, I wouldn't. I think that NFL (all professional) teams should be considered a public trust and not allowed to move except under the most dire of circumstances. She screwed up in the first place by moving the team to Anaheim, which is 40 to 50 miles away from her fan base (despite what Arnie Moreno might tell you) into a decrepit stadium. And then she complained because no one wanted to come to the games. I don't see why she is any different than Bob Irsay moving the Baltimore Colts or Art Modell moving the Browns (though Browns fans did get a version of their team back).
And while we're talking about football, even though the USC Trojans are my favourite college team, they are still just a college team. Yes, but I was refuting the point another poster made that LA would not support football. I think the success USC and UCLA have in continuously attracting huge crowds of fans is strong evidence that LA absolutely would support an NFL franchise.
And while we're talking about football, even though the USC Trojans are my favourite college team, they are still just a college team. Yes, but I was refuting the point another poster made that LA would not support football. I think the success USC and UCLA have in continuously attracting huge crowds of fans is strong evidence that LA absolutely would support an NFL franchise. posted by cjets at 3:50 PM CST on January 19 Winning solves all problems. Put a team that has a scheme for winning (sorry to some, but the New England Patriots and Boston Red Sox are the current models for such teams), fans will show up to all games and fill seats, not to mention buy team logo wear and gear.
All this evidence of support for UCLA and USC football convinces me of NOTHING. Actually, it's evidence of the OPPOSITE...........that there are too many other things going on in Los Angeles for anyone to care about an NFL team.