Now *that* was five words.
I love how the MSU fan's post is riddled with grammatical errors. If you are going to bring the smack, at least make sure that your post is tight! Anyway, being a hockey guy, I will argue that the Holy Cross win over Minnesota in the NCAA tourney 2 seaons ago was a more impressive upset. That Holy Cross team, although being a DI program, was composed entirely of walk-on "gamers" and did not have the kind of history of sucess that App State has. Meanwhile, the Minnesota team that Holy Cross defeated had more pro prospects than the 07 Michigan football team (or quite possibly any Michigan team in the history of its football program). The Minnesota hockey team was also coached by a guy who had already won a national title, unlike the Michigan football team. With hardly any talent to skate with the Golden Gophers, the heart of the Holy Cross team carried them to an OT victory. http://www.uscho.com/recaps/
20052006/m/03/24/hc-umn.php
The Minnesota hockey team was also coached by a guy who had already won a national title, unlike the Michigan football team. With hardly any talent to skate with the Golden Gophers, the heart of the Holy Cross team carried them to an OT victory. BCHockey, I'm pretty sure Lloyd Carr "led" Michigan to a National Title his first year at Michigan. Obviously this wasn't his team, but rather the one he inherited from his predecessor, but technically he did still win a NT with Michigan.
What brain said.
from #5 to out of the AP 25.
Never mind Michigan fans, college football traditionalists HATE it when something like this happens, with a capital H. It's bad enough when one of the top teams through history such as Michigan, USC, or one of the Florida teams gets upset, but this loss and the way it happened is unacceptable to them. It not only upset the apple cart as they knew it, it was blown up with dynamite. College football will NEVER be the same again. I love it.
I can't remember the last time I saw an AP Top 25 that didn't include Michigan, Notre Dame, or Florida State. In fact, I don't know if I've ever seen it. /grumbait
/grumbait Awesome. That should become a regularpart of Spofi vernacular
It already is. It has also been defined by SpoFite McSmokey.
Seems like it's either a noun or verb. As in, a somewhat off-kilter assertion not backed by stats is grumbait. To make said assertion, knowing you may very well be torn a statistical new one, is to grumbait.
Actually, I prefer the third definition: As I'm too lazy to do my own research, I'll dangle an open-ended statistical query out there, just hoping it attracts the attention of the fearsome grumbeast, who will then do all the heavy lifting for me, research-wise. Then, later, in the real world, I'll use the stats he digs up to make myself look smart. Well, smarter, anyway.